By Gary Hirshberg, Chief Organic Optimist and Chairman of Just Label It and Scott Faber, Environmental Working Group Vice President of Government Affairs
In 2011, Stonyfield helped to launch Just Label It (JLI), the national campaign for full GMO transparency. I (Gary) have been Chairman of Just Label It from the start and millions of consumers and hundreds of companies have joined us in pressing for a simple national label that clearly informs consumers whether our foods contain GMO’s. Sixty-Four nations around the world provide consumers with this vital information, but the US remains stubbornly unwilling to provide citizens with the right to know.
Nearly two years ago, Congress passed a bill that pre-empted the rights of individual states to require mandatory GMO labeling in favor of a unified national standard. Unfortunately neither JLI nor Stonyfield could support the law because we felt it had many deficiencies that could be manipulated to keep consumers in the dark. Nevertheless the law passed and was signed by President Obama and it required the USDA to finalize rules to take effect two years later, this coming July, 2018.
Several weeks ago, the USDA finally published the long-awaited draft rule. Unfortunately, all of our concerns about the law have been realized…the proposed rule falls far short of both the letter and the spirit of the labeling law. Now unfortunately the only hope is for all of us as citizens to demand that the USDA and Congress revise and fix the law so that US citizens can have the same rights as those who live in really progressive countries like Russia and China.
JLI and Stonyfield have long believed that Americans should have the right to know what’s in our food and how it’s grown, just like consumers in the other 64 other nations. When Congress passed the first-ever national GMO food disclosure law in 2016, they promised consumers a disclosure system that would cover more ingredients and be simple to use.
But the draft rule proposed by the USDA could exclude almost three-fourths of products with genetically engineered ingredients. What’s more, the rule proposes requiring confusing new terminology and symbols when companies make on-package disclosures. The proposed rule sets up few limits when companies choose to make digital disclosures. It also doesn’t provide practical solutions for consumers who need to scan a digital disclosure but don’t own smartphones or those who have lousy cell service.
Now’s the time to tell the USDA to require full and transparent GMO disclosures. The rule must reject confusing words and symbols, ensure that QR codes are easy to scan, and guarantee real-world solutions for consumers without smartphones or those with poor cell service.
Margaret Mead told us to “never doubt the power of a small group of citizens to change the world…indeed it is the only thing that ever has.” Now is the moment to follow her adage. We have until July 3rd to submit comments to the USDA telling them to address the deficiencies above. Please take a moment today to send in an email or letter to the USDA to let them know they must do better to protect our rights to know.
Learn more here: https://www.ewg.org/agmag/2018/05/proposed-gmo-disclosure-rule-leaves-consumers-dark#.WwM6uFMvx-U
We noticed you are from [language].We've heard how much you love Stonyfield, so we created a site just for you.
or continue to